Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Being, Itself, Is We can feel Identified with Being We can feel Alienated from Being But, maybe, we are neither Perhaps we are, rather, Connected to Being For, in Identification, we learn of the Power of Being For, in Alienation, we learn of our Love of Being For identification gifts us with potency and effective strivings For alienation gifts us with yearning and affective longings But power without love is brutality And love without power is sentimentality In Perfect Being would reside Power and Love Thus, Unconnected to Perfect Being, We are brutality and sentimentality Our logos, a noisy gong Our eros, a clanging cymbal Our ethos mere brute sentiment And so, at the end of each day, How have I been brutal? How have I been sentimental? When have I been connected? And when disconnected? And the Power of the Father And the Love of the Spirit Were embodied in the Son And your body is the nexus For the next Incarnation And your soul will contain the love And your spirit will contain the power And your body will be Your Holy Connection to Being, Itself A living temple, so important, That it will be resurrected one day Glorified, but with All the signs of its woundedness All of its scars and memories Of touch and taste and smell and sight and hearing Worn as sacraments of transformation For Love does not lead us away from problems For Love is not our way out of difficulties Those are sentimental notions Love, rather, invites us into problems and difficulties Such that in our passing through them We are transformed into Love, Herself And Power does not lead us to victory over problems And Power does not lead us to victory over difficulties Those are brute notions Power, rather, will not turn stones to bread Will not cut off the enemy�s ear But will light our way through the valley of darkness As the Word, as a lamp unto our feet and light unto our eyes His Peace is not as the world gives Neither is His power nor His love He is not merely immanent He is not merely transcendent He is immanent-transcendent We are to be neither identified with Him Nor alienated from him But connected to Him in the core of our being Now, here, in love. Sentimental Love is never now But always in a longed for past or future Seeking to be recovered or discovered Brute Power is never here But always lost, stolen or misplaced Needing to be wrestled away from another So much of our own daily walks So much of the way of the world Is brute sentimentality Disguised as passive-aggressive manipulation and control Forcing our way on others, insidiously and craftily With conniving and cunning, so well entrenched through habit As to be carried out even unawares and in need of being called out Into the Lamp Light of His Word which is a Powerful two-edged Sword So much of our own daily walks So much of the way of the world Is brute sentimentality Not at all disguised efforts at manipulation and control Forcing our way on others, overtly and blatantly With intimidation and aggression, so well entrenched through habit As to be carried out even unawares and in need of being called out Into the Lamp Light of His Word which is a Powerful two-edged Sword So much of our own daily walks So much of the way of the world Can be an Incarnational Realization Not at all disguised efforts Not seeking control Not forcing our way on others So well entrenched through habit and virtue As to be carried out even unawares For God�s Gift, the Holy Spirit Does not want you to be afraid Is not a spirit of timidity But of Power and Love and SELF-control This is my processing of my reflections on Richard Rohr's "In Search of the Holy Grail". [although some of this won't resemble what he said but is my abstruse extrapolation] jb Speaking of Music: Check Out My Brother's Songs | |||
|
JB, I enjoyed your reflection. Must have been an inspired time for you. Help me understand some of your points in the first four paragraphs. There seem to be references to ontological union and mystical union, but I'm not sure where you're applying the "disconnect." Obviously, it cannot be in reference to our ontological connection with God, or else we would disappear if that one were lost. If you're referring to spiritual/mystical grace, however, I would agree that we can lose that through neglect of the relationship, in which case we can actually feel alienated even while being connected in a natural, ontological way. I've enjoyed listening to Fr. Rohr and reading some of his books. Often, however, I find him speaking more as a poet without giving sufficient attention to the philosophical implications of what he says. Still, there's no doubting the relevance of the insights he/you provide concerning the "two ways." Good food for discerning movements in the heart. Phil | ||||
|
Thesis: It is the Incarnation which overcame the Adamic Fall and prevents humanity from being mere sentimental brutes. The disconnect may come about several ways (since it's a poem) - I was musing on a couple of levels: 1) Lack of cooperation with the Grace of the Incarnation (lack of realization) and also 2) Lack of awareness of both immanence AND transcendence. I was thus also taking a back-handed swipe at pantheism. Of course, I agree with you and Juan de la Cruz who insisted our connection to God remains even when we are not in the state of Grace. Rather than nuance it heavily, I left room for interpretation and exegesis, but you already know, of course, whether I am an epistemic and/or ontological dualist, emergent monist, nonreductive physicalist, materialist monist, aspect monist, pantheist, panentheist, ontological reductionist, dipolar monist, panexperientialist, or adherent of ontological emergence and/or process metaphysics. Pax tibi, jb | ||||
|
but you already know, of course, whether I am an epistemic and/or ontological dualist, emergent monist, nonreductive physicalist, materialist monist, aspect monist, pantheist, panentheist, ontological reductionist, dipolar monist, panexperientialist, or adherent of ontological emergence and/or process metaphysics Showoff! Yeah, I do know, just wanting you to take a turn on the theology podium, that's all. Phil | ||||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |