05 June 2008, 05:51 AM
FreddySuffering
Dear friends,
A somehow urgent message here!
I am 50 years old now and I have traveled a long spiritual journey: Western philosophy, Jehovah's Witnesses, Evangelicalism, Pentecostalism, Charismatic movement, Zen Buddhism, Roman Catholicism.
Since 1996, after a divorce in 1994, I am wrestling permanently with a chronic, very painful tension pain in my chest (heart chakra) and solar plexus (an emotional or mental blockade) with breathing problems. I have tried every possible therapy, regular (psychiatrists, medication...) and alternative (yoga, rebirthing, reiki, meditation, homeopathy, Bach flowers, reflexology, bio-energetics, emotional body work, breath therapy...) without finding any relief.
I studied Greek and Latin and have read hundreds of books on philosophy, theology, spirituality, (contemplative) psychology, literature and arts in general since I was about 20 years old. In fact, I have grown out now of most of my question I had before or, Rilke in mind, I try to live out these questions, more than to wait for clear-cut answers to the many paradoxes in life in general and in the spiritual life in particular.
There is of course a lot I have to say here, but I'll try to be short. I have always been searching (far too rationally) in books for answers to who I am, who God is, what life is all about. I think this urgent, feverish searching stems from hypersensitivity, anxiety and inferiority feelings dating from my youth. It is a strange thing that I don't remember anything of my youth. But I cannot recall what has happened. A sister of the Catholic Charismatic movement once received an image (from God?) of a foetus, shrunk by fear. I heard that my mother was not married when she was pregnant of me and that she experienced some fear and shame at the time. My parents are after all good and friendly people, but I have developed for some reason a kind of fear of my father (father wound), who was a hard season worker in France (and was for long times away from house) and could react very impulsively and rather unpredictably (this is is a kind of mirror for myself). I guess he has never affimed me in my masculinity. So I feel I miss the �wild� energy of a man (realism, responsability, adventure, �), although I have a strong and healthy body. There is something that restrains me and I have always rather been the 'decent boy', who had to be still when we went out. My mother has been a full-time hair dresser and I was raised by my paternal grandmother, who lived with us and with her sister (my aunt) spoiled me quite a lot!
At 11 years I seem to have been very nervous and restless. I had nervous tics in my face and was a stammerer. At that time I went to a boarding school, where I was confronted with 2 paedophile brothers ('of love'!).
I feel that somehow I have cut off my feelings and emotions and created false selves like the perfectionist, the moralist, the artist/hermit, the scaredy-cat, the clown, the critical thinker and so forth...The tension in the solar plexus (abdomen) and heart chakra creates a sharp division line between my head (full as the cup of tea in the short Zen story) and my emotions (hara). I have learned to think very fastly (I notice this, working with my colleagues) and am very good in summarizing texts and writing. There is however always some kind of perfectionism in all this. I am constantly creating defence mechanisms of primary defence, fear, false hope (f.e. my work before as a plasteree in order to get the attention and praise of my father!) , false power or denial of needs (see: Past reality integration:
http://www.pastrealityintegration.nl/pri_en/index.htm I have always had psycho-somatic problems (in the army in Germany in 1979, in Ireland in 1980...)and I have to pay attention with alcohol (an inherited problem). I don't drink much anymore, but when I start drinking I cannot stop it...
The main question is that I have to try now to slow down and to descend from my head into my heart, as we all know from the desert fathers and the fathers of the Orthodox Church, practicing the Jesus Prayer.
I have searched far too much for handholds, clear answers, systems, rules and so forth... because I struggled and still struggle with inner �demons� of fear (for life, the judgement?), melancholy, nervosity, restlessness, anger, sadness, irritation, judging people, perfectionism, compulsive behaviour, control coercion, a lack of taking responsability and realism, 'contemptus mundi', shame and guilt, lack of joy. I call it the �syndrome of Saul� (see for this in:
http://www.amazon.com/Father-H...cClung/dp/0890814910 in the Bible.
I admit also I have probably been rather fundamentalistic and fanatical before out of a concern about (biblical) truth but I gradually opened myself to other traditions and belief systems and I learned a lot from so-called Christian mysticism, gnosticism, esotericism, hermeticism, but also from Buddhism. My ex-wife left me two images, describing myself, that are very to the point, I guess: (1) a bottomless barrel, (2) stepping on the gas without getting anywhere, (3)a bulldozer who throws everything behind him and let the others pick up the pieces ...
Because of all my suffering

and pain, I have of course been looking for answers to this enduring mystery in order to know how to cope with it:
1. Most orthodox, devotional or evangelical Christians give the impression that everything is possible for him who has faith in God and His' Word. Moreover, this is something that is also written in the Bible. Certain prominent Pentecostals (f.e. Derek Prince, after all a great man of God!), go as far as to say that by proclaiming God's words (�Words have power�, as they also say in New Age!) like 'and with His' stripes we are healed' (Is. 53;5), we eventually (as D. Prince himself experienced) get healed. But we have to ask with faith (James)! So there is something as growth possible in faith... In the USA there is a whole movement of 'Name it and clame it', resulting from earlier so-called American gospels (think of N.V. Peale). The thought behind it is: since Christ has risen from death, we Christians, baptized in Christ, share in His' resurrection power. Perverted, this may lead to a 'health and wealth' gospel, which is not Christian at all! It is more like magic! Is this typically American? I have the impression that �suffering� is a thing that is seriously suppressed in this land of 'hope and glory'? Europeans (and especially f.e. Russians) know much better by bitter experience what suffering is all about. Is this the reason that there are institutes such as Esalen, the cradle of an optimistic, humanistic and transpersonal psychology, which in some way has become a sort of religion (building on W. James, CG Jung a.o.). (see the excellent book by P. Vitz:
http://www.amazon.com/Psycholo...orship/dp/0802807259 But how many times I have hoped myself that through proclaiming, confessing, speaking out the words (rhema) of God in the Bible, the Word (logos), I would get better!
In fact, Paul speaks of 'Putting on the armor of God' (Eph.6;11-17) to �fight the good fight�. But I have always asked myself: how to understand this? What did the desert fathers and mothers, those great psychologists avant-la-lettre and strong people of faith, actually do in front of their inner struggles, sufferings, trials, demons? Did they fight in the name of Christ or did they let go, accept and surrender? And what is the difference between these 3? How to cope with emotional, psychological, physical problems? We know that by resisting something, the very thing we struggle with tends to grow.Where is the boundary line between sins (that have to be forgiven), wounds (that have to be healed), bonds (that have to be broken) and 'hounds'(that have to be be cast out? In Deuteronium the Israelites have the choice between life and dead, but I have always wondered myself how little this free choice-free will actually is! What about people in wars, concentration camps, handicapped people and so forth... (see Eli Wiesel)
2. Another 'strategy' therefore consists in learning to accept anything that is happening. I am thinking of most of the saints (see John of the Cross on necessary dark nights that purify and heal,http://www.ccel.org/ccel/john_cross/dark_night.html Alphonsus de Liguori
http://www.ccel.org/ccel/alphonsus/uniformity.html De Caussade:
http://www.ccel.org/ccel/decaussade/abandonment.html and many others!
As in Buddhism: not to reject anything, not to get attached to anything, not to judge, God's Will and Provindence is actually here and now, in the present moment (Tolle?).In the present eternity touches time! But this not as a kind of Sto�cism, rather with compassion and warmth as you would rock gently a wounded child. But how many times I have tried in meditation to sit quietly with this pain, observing my breath and saying my 'Jesus'-word, without finding any relief! I have spoken about �rehabilitation� before on another thread. Many Christians, even great saints, have been accused of dolorism (Th�r�se of Lisieux, Elisabeth of the Trinity, Sister Faustina, Marthe Robin, Padre Pio...), because they 'enjoyed' suffering for the Lord's sake as a sort of rehabilitation (French: r�paration) to the righteousness of God, that is stained and dishonoured by sin and as a kind of vicarious suffering with the Lord (see also Simone Weil, Etty Hillesum...). I think this is a very deep and profound question, which can not easily be neglected (see the text at the end).
3. In the first case, God is the Allmighty, the Resurrected, the Living Wounded Healer, and when our faith is strong enough we get healed. All depends on our identification with Christ (through grace!) in His' resurrection power. But when we don't get healed, the danger of feeling guilty, unfaithful etc... is obvious, which in it's turn causes even more pain. So this is not a very loving thing after all.
4. In the second case, Christianity resembles (but is of course not the same as) Buddhism and all other spiritual traditions and common sense in general. What lies at the background of this point of seeing things is the knowledge of the contingency, vulnerability, mortality, transitoriness of everything in this world. Christ, in this case, is before all a Wounded Healer, God is a humble God! Through the growth of science, we postmodern people speak of second reasons and many times it is difficult to keep an overview and grant honour to the first reason (God). We also know that Christ had to go through a radical 'k�nosis', a self-emptying, a laying down of His' Godly nature to become one with us (except in sin) and even to descend into hell: the (universal) dark night of the soul...
Is this 'k�nosis' (purification) after all not the path every person (Christian) has to go as a �via negativa�? Is it then not more appropriate to learn to live in a very humble way from the grace of little flashes of light now and then in the midst of a life full of questions, problems, mysteries, pain and so forth...?
Or is there more and can we really live out the other side in this life, i.o.w. 'Are we really more than conquerors through Him...' (Paul)and so yes, how to get there? New Agers for that matter seem (?) to get what they want, hmm...
Is there ultimately only one choice: whether all or nothing? Is the God of the Bible not the Wholly Other, Transcendent God whose ways are not our ways? We are so afraid that this 'nada' (John of the Cross) is in fact 'nothing' at all and represents 'nothing', that it is all illusory..., but our daily consciousness is much more illusionary than we think it is!
But HS seems to point at something else than on the one hand immediate satisfaction or an answer to all our prayers and questions and on the other hand ascetic withdrawal from all earthly pleasure and delight. Only, how to live with this paradox, with this biblical earthly dynamics (see Bonhoeffer) on the one hand and all our intense heavenly longing for love, peace, justice, freedom, joy etc... on the other hand. What about all the promises God has made in the Bible of an abundant life of joy? Nietzsche said that he would consider becoming a Christian when Christians were not as earnest and joyless... I think he has certainly a point!
There is in me such a desire to live fully, to break through (self-imposed?) boundaries and explore new territories, new life (the �conversio morum� of St. Benedict). But this asks for letting go of reliable, safe perspectives and costums (and pain).This asks for much silence, listening, attention, patience...
On the other hand, this fear, this pain isolates me a great deal and makes me look for security, for God as a Rock (the �stabilitas� of St. Benedict). I have to learn to listen (the �osculta� of St. Benedict) to the voice of God, to my body, to my feelings, to my thoughts, to my fellow-men, to nature and to all things� where God is hidden! But I feel so vulnerable!
There is as Gr�n pointed out a 'spirituality from above' (ideals, doctrines, laws, rules, morals,...) and a 'spirituality from below' (body, emotions, desires, intuition, wounds...).
Transcendent God and immanent God?
Apophatic and kataphatic approach?
I like the spirituality of father David Steindl Rast, again a Benedictine monk, on �gratefulness�. But how to be grateful in the midst of long lasting pain, loneliness, the feeling of dying of self, ego (which is good after all!)?
Conclusion: there is a fundamental polarity between 'allocentricity' and 'autocentricity'. How to know when you have to wait and when you have to act? When you have to speak and when you have to be silent?
The allocentric attitude takes a lot of courage, the courage of Christ the Lion. And a basic trust, which I seem to lack, is a condition for it, in other words �Christ the Lamb�!
The autocentricity can be perverted into a secundary autocentric attitude, which limits, restricts and reinforces a certain hostility or jealousy towards the 'world' (�contemptus mundi�).
I have to learn to accept that I am loved, whatever the circumstances are and whatever I am or how I feel! I have stayed alone since my wife left me in 1994. I wished to be �pious� and trusting the Lord. I somehow played the role of the �heremit�, which is not my vocation after all! I adore women, I am such a romantic and at the same time, I feel some fear or uncertainty in their presence or I believe they cannot comprehend my complexity.
Is it good to meditate (centering prayer or another method)? Do I better stay with word prayer in a more devotional way? Or do I need more psychological counseling?
The Indian S. Painadath, S.J. wrote a book 'Der Geist reisst Mauern nieder'.
In general, I can agree with what he is saying from the perspective of the interreligious dialogue. R. Panikkar has said similar things in 'Christophany'...
The point seems to be the following:
There seems to be a difference between what I would call the 'religion about Jesus' and the 'religion of Jesus'.
The first implies: a prophetic dimension (emphasis on ethics, rules, law,...),'theology' (dogma's, orthodoxy...), prayer to Someone out there, devotion, Jesus as an object of adoration, the centrality of the cross, an eternal existential distance between God and man through sin, exclusivism, uniqueness of Christ, transcendence of God, the importance of the Word and obedience, apologetics, patriarchal-masculine ...
The second implies: a mystic dimension (emphasis on inner experience and initiation, symbolic consciousness), 'theosophy' , meditation (essential is the Consciousness of Jesus: I and the Father are one, I am who I am...), Jesus as subject of a spiritual experience (pan-an-theism???), the centrality of resurrection, an ontological unity between God and man (Paul: 'In Him we live...'), inclusivism, opennes to other traditions, transcendence and immanence of God, the importance of the Holy Spirit (pneumatic) and Sophia, God as the deepest Self, the ground of being, ..., inner initiation and transformation, dialogue, matriarchal-feminine...
A very interesting discussion on all this is of course:
http://shalomplace.com/res/index.html (the �Dialogue between Jim Marion en Philippe St.Romain�) and the websites:
http://www.innerexplorations.com/, http://www.monasticdialog.com/, http://www.gratefulness.org/, http://www.spiritualityandpractice.com/, http://www.cutsinger.net/, http://www.worldwisdom.com/Public/index.asp, http://www.sophiaperennis.com/, http://www.dur.ac.uk/theology.religion/ On the other hand, I have problems with the so-called 'perennial philosophy' and 'Sophia Perennis' movement (H. Smith, R.Panikkar, W. Teasdale, M. Fox and many many others within the Christian Church).
Another point I wish to make is about the place of (psycho)therapy/psychology versus Christian faith.I have problems as a Christian with many therapies, such as Jungian therapy (Jung was after all a gnostic, even an occultist, which doesn't mean he has not said true things about the unconscious and so forth...), Past Reality Integration (PRI, Ingeborg Bosch), Transpersonal psychology ... I feel blocked!
I know of Christians, practicing Jungian therapy (Jean Monbourqette in the shadow, forgiveness...
http://www.allbookstores.com/a..._Monbourquette.html, Thomas Moore (Christian?)
http://www.careofthesoul.net/...), but also Christian therapists/priests, departing from a purely biblical (charismatic) point of view (Simone Pacot, Leanne Payne,S. Bodishbaugh, Nelly Astelli, Francis McNutt...).
A book which made me think a lot about the relativity and self-centeredness of modern therapies is the above-called:
http://www.amazon.com/Psycholo...rship/dp/0802807259! What did the desert fathers and Christians afterwards before there was any psychology/therapy do with their wounds???
However: Please look at PRI. I met one man who was seriously addicted to hero�ne, but was healed by practicing PRI!
So I wish to be faithful to Christ in all aspects of my life and I feel torn between accepting what is happening (so difficult!)/trusting God and the need for therapy, which mostly has different points of view from Christianity. You understand my problem? Is this a sort of resistance against a sound therapy? Can spiritual counseling with a priest be helpful? Is this a dark night I have to accept? I don't know! I do know however I have to forgive my father because of my father wound. But this is also a process I have to go with the help of the Holy Spirit. I have tried some cranio-sacral therapy. Maybe I have to go on with it?
But there is so much!!!
I close with the sayings of Jesus to the Indian Christian convert Sadhu Sundar Singh in 'At the Feet of the Master':
'Suffering is an extinguisher of God's wrath and an obtainer of His' favour. It lessens delight and increases grace. Suffering is the surest way, the nearest way, the shortest way. Suffering is affection's rod, a paternal blow given to my elect. Patience in suffering is a living sacrifice, a sweet smell of balsam before my divine face, it is an appealing wonder before the entire host of heaven. Patience in suffering is superior to raising the deads or the performing of other miracles. Without labor there is no rest and without fighting there is no victory.'
Where is the cross of Christ in all movements of positive thinking, self-realization, perennialism, gnosticism, hermeticism, metaphysics and so forth and so forth�? That is my main question!
Summarized: on suffering:
1. God doesn't want us to be sick, suffering
2. Sometimes he sends or allows tribulations (Job) for (1) His' own glory, (2) the purification of man (3) the salvation of other souls... (?)
How to deal with it? Acceptance and surrender, rehabilitation (many saints) versus struggle, proclamation (see Pentecostals), identification with the risen Christ...
I am convinced it is all about finding (or being found by) the God within, who is Unconditional Love. It is all about learning to live with awareness, gratefulness, openness in the present, here and now (Blake). Only how to get to this source, this well, this pearl of great price within ourselves? There are of course different approaches and maybe I don�t know yet what my own path really is. Sometimes I pray the rosary, other times I sit quietly with a word, still other times I go for a walk or try to help someone�
Two years ago, I went with a woman, who in the meantime has become a girl friend, to Banneux, a Marian pilgrim place here in Belgium, and so I came across the devotional movement (see also in the 12th, 13th and 14th century!), which I first found too sweety, too devotional, too softy but which I gradually came to appreciate because of the power of the rosary, the idea of vicarious suffering and 'r�paration' (rehabilitation to the Father), the simplicity in it's ranks ('Blessed are the poor of spirit'???) and so forth...
At the same time, some people (a.o. the Benedictine monk Anselm Gr�n) urge me to pay attention to my psychology/emotional life and this pain and stay with it to see the real message of my soul behind it. Sometimes I find some rest in breathing exercices and one word prayer. I try to accept the pain as a 'wounded child' and stay as quiet as possible after reading so many books all these years. I admit I have become addicted to books and learning (spiritual) things, but there isn� t any end at reading books as the Bible says. �Spiritual materialism' (Trungpa) or 'spiritual bypassing' is a pitfall! Is it possible that through prayer and meditation (contemplation) alone is enough or is there any need for therapy with all this pain and unresolved emotions?
PAX!
Greetings,
Fred Delameilleure
Graaf de Smet de Naeyerlaan 76
Ostend (Belgium)
Tel. 059/333575
e-mail: freddy.delameilleure@wvg.vlaanderen.be